It is too much like the first one so not much new is explored, but interesting to see anyway.
THE RETURN TO THE BLUE LAGOON NUDE SCENES MOVIE
No, by no means is this a great movie but it is interesting. As the story progressed and they entered puberty we see them facing many of the behavioral issues the teens in the first movie faced, and mirror what teens in our own society face. Brian Krause, who was 20 or 21 during filming, was Richard, the boy that the baby boy grew into. Milla Jovovich, who was only 14 or 15 during filming, is very suitable as Lilli, the girl the baby grew into on the island. The story that results is very similar to the first movie, in that an adult and 2 small children are stranded on an uncharted island, in fact the same uncharted island, and there the children grow into young adulthood. But on board the crew soon begin to come down with an illness, Cholera, so the woman and the two small children are put out on a lifeboat, it is their only chance to survive. On board the ship are a mother and her daughter, and she decides to care for the baby boy. As a small party from the ship board the small boat, they find the parents no longer alive, but the baby boy is fine. This movie, "Return", takes up where that one ended, somewhere in the Pacific, in the late 1800s. We don't really know what happened or if they survived. In 'Blue Lagoon' the movie ends with the young couple and their baby adrift at sea as a boat approaches.
THE RETURN TO THE BLUE LAGOON NUDE SCENES TV
Graham made a career of TV movies and although RETURN TO THE BLUE LAGOON had a theatrical release, it feels very much like a second-rate outing in every respect. Jovovich definitely has something feral within her, but less use is made of that as in THE FIFTH ELEMENT, which handled her unique qualities perfectly. The age gap between Milla Jovovich and Brian Krause is too obvious, and Krause is as equally wooden as Christopher Atkins before him. The acting doesn't really sit right either. Once again the film is all about puberty, isolation, love and family, except as it's not original it feels like a lukewarm rehash of the first movie. There are a few differences here - the adult with them is a woman, the boy is the son of the couple from THE BLUE LAGOON, they're staying in the same place so make use of the already-there house, etc. It's an entirely superfluous kind of film that sees yet another couple of kids washed up on a desert island and having to fend for themselves against nature and their fellow man. With their maturing bodies and raging hormones, there are plenty of awkward encounters between the two. But The Blue Lagoon is far grimmer and more disturbing than you likely remember, especially for a movie that makes "young love" one of its centerpieces.RETURN TO THE BLUE LAGOON, made 11 years after the successful first film, is one of those movies that's happy to reprise the plot of the original while adding a few twists and tweaks of its own. The only adult in the story doesn't make it, and the adolescents are left marooned together. It opens with three people shipwrecked on a remote South Pacific island. The plot is relatively straightforward and features standard stuff for a human survival story. While the scenes were simulated using a body double for Shields, the film is still uncomfortable to watch. The 1980 film version, which stars Brooke Shields and Christopher Atkins, is likely the most problematic of all the incarnations of the story: It depicts several sex scenes between 14-year-old Shields and 19-year-old Atkins. Not creepy in a spooky way, but creepy in a messed-up, this-is-super-problematic way. The Blue Lagoon, a classic(ish) 1908 novel by Henry De Vere Stacpoole, has inspired five films despite being pretty creepy.
0 kommentar(er)
